I've gotten 3-5 kills in the first 3 minutes simply by using that one position.Įven with my turret and UFP exposed the range is so far that they have no chance of fighting back, due to the high velocity shells, armor and turret face. The point by the windmills at Eastern Europe for example (on the top spawn) can be navigated to by the T-64 in the first 20 seconds and used to snipe any tanks driving to A. Gun depression doesn't even matter all that much, assuming you get into a decent position. The Abrams is king due to its versatility. Yeah those are both huge, what about reload speed, gun depression, N steering helps when getting out of tight spots. Survivability / reverse speed is your only weakness. Sure, Abrams holds your hand but I personally value the T-series over Abrams 90% of the time.
I've even had T-64's turn to expose their sides whilst in a 1v1 with them. Like seriously, its as if the majority of Russian players don't even know their own weakspots. The main issue with the 64s is how they just explode on any pen, i can do well in the 64 its just not as good as the Abrams.īad players that expose their sides 90% of the time. The T64 isnt close to nearly impenetrable, i got through it with M735 8 times out of 10. Lineup is typically what matters when it comes to winrate, NOT the tank itself. Originally posted by Sir Det Mist:Well yeah its not invincible, if you act stupid youll die, if you use your speed and good armor you will dominate. The T-80 capitalizes on that by being able to reach better spots, albeit with the slightly weaker UFP. You also have disabling HE that you can just spam at the front of the enemy tank to destroy the cannon and tracks at will, allowing easy destruction of Abrams at close quarters. I can literally argue that if you don't do well in the T-64b you just suck, since that tank is nearly impenetrable from the front, has the easiest aiming shells in the game, can penetrate the majority of surfaces it hits (except 60 degrees) and has the best optics alongside the Abrams the easiest way to win is to just sit from afar and shoot the ducks.
As an American you can spam out so many alternative tanks that winning is practically guaranteed, especially with the latest update.
If you cant do well in an Abrams you just suck.Ībrams winrate is primarily to do with Americans having the best line-up overall, not the performance of the tank. I mean the 65% win rate and the 2.1 global KD says it all. This is a user issue the Abrams is awesome. TOO OP! Well yeah its not invincible, if you act stupid youll die, if you use your speed and good armor you will dominate. Originally posted by SturmAlpha:faces a t64 or a leo, dies one shot. Seriosuly the 64 and 80 reverse so slowly, just shoot their mantlet to take out then gun then shoot their lower glacius. If they gave the M1 M833 the game would be broken, US teams would win games in under 5 mins everytime and would have win rates over 80%, the only weakness the Abrams has is ultra long range sniping and if you can aim its still ok at that.
#Business todo driver#
Originally posted by Sir Det Mist:The Abrams can also pen everything from the front you just have to aim a bit, also add in your fast reload, your speed, and the fact you can take survive being ammo racked, you can also survive many more hits then any other tank.ĭo u even play it? it cant even pen t64 front armor angled, u should know what u talk about mate!! Yes can, shoot the driver port, or the lower glacius.Īs you can see it can go through even at 1000m just learn to aim, or use your speed and flank and get those easy side shots.